One sector that fosters national development is education by ensuring functional human resource development. The institution of strong educational structures leads to a society populated by enlightened people who can cause positive economic progress and social transformation. Positive social change and its associated economic growth are achieved as the apply the skills they learned in school. The acquisition of these skills is facilitated by one individual we all ‘teacher.’ For this reason, nations seeking economic and social development need not ignore teachers and their role in national development.
Teachers are the education and the general performance of the students they train. Therefore, the teachers ought to get the best education, so they can, in turn, help prepare students in the best ways. It is known that the quality of teachers and quality teaching are some of the most important factors that shape students’ learning and social and academic growth.. Teachers’ performance generally determines the quality of
Quality training will ensure, to a large extent, teachers are of very high quality to be able to manage classrooms and facilitate learning properly. Teacher quality is still a concern, even in countries where students consistently obtain high scores in international exams, such as Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). In such countries, teacher education is of prime importance because it can potentially cause positive student achievements.
READ MORE :
- There Are Two Kinds of People in the U.S. – Those Who View Health As Static and Those Who Don’t
- Rio’s Dirty Little Secret – Human Rights and the 2016 Olympics
- Slower iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales drove Apple’s revenue down in Q2 2016
- How Britain funds the ‘propaganda war’ against Isis in Syria
- My coworkers made me use Mac OS 9 for their (and your) amusement
The structure of teacher education keeps changing in almost all countries in response to the quest to produce teachers who understand students’ current needs or just the demand for teachers. The changes attempt to ensure quality teachers are paid and sometimes ensure that classrooms are not free of teachers. In the U.S.A.., promoting high-quality teachers has been an issue of contention and, for the past decade or so, has been motivated through the methods prescribed by the No Child Left Behind Act (Accomplished California Teachers, 2015).
Teacher education is, therefore, no joke anywhere. Even in Japan and other Eastern countries, where more teachers are needed, and structures have been instituted to ensure high-quality teachers are produced and employed, issues relating to teacher and teaching quality are still of concern (Ogawa, Fujii & Ikuo, 2013). , This article is in two parts. It first discusses Ghana’s teacher education system, and the second part looks at some determinants of quality teaching.
2.0 TEACHER EDUCATION
Ghana has deliberately attempted to produce quality teachers for her basic school classrooms. As Benneh (2006) indicated, Ghana’s teacher education aims to provide a complete teacher education program through initial teacher training and in-service training programs that will produce competent teachers who will help improve the effectiveness of teaching and learning in schools. The Initial teacher education program for Ghana’s basic school teachers was offered in Colleges of Education (CoE) only until recently when the University of Education, University of Cape Coast, Central University College, and other tertiary institutions joined in.
The most striking difference between the programs offered by the other tertiary institution is that while the Universities teach, examine, and award certificates to their students, the Colleges of Education offer tuition. In contrast, the University of Cape Coast examines and awards certificates through the Institute of Education. The training programs offered by these institutions are attempts at providing many qualified teachers to teach in the schools. The National Accreditation Board accredits teacher training programs to ensure quality.
The National Accreditation Board accredits teacher education programs based on the structure and content of the courses proposed by the institution. Hence, the systems run by various institutions differ in content and design. For example, the course content for the Institute of Education, University of Cape Coast, is slightly different from the course structure and content of the Center for Continuing Education. None of these programs matches the CoEs, though they all award a Diploma in Basic Education (D.B.E.) after three years of training.
The D.B.E. and the Four-year Untrained Teacher’s Diploma in Basic Education (UTDBE) programs run by the CoEs are similar but not the same. The same can be said of the Two-year Post-Diploma in Basic Education, Four-year Bachelor’s degree programs run by the University of Cape Coast, the University of Education, Winneba, and other Universities and University Colleges. In effect, even though the same products attract the same clients, the preparation of the products is done in different ways.
Through these many programs, teachers are prepared for the basic schools – from nursery to senior high schools. Alternative pathways or programs through which teachers are prepared are seen as good in situations with shortages, and more teachers should be trained quickly. A typical example is the UTDBE above program, designed to equip non-professional teachers with professional skills. But this attempt to produce more teachers, because of a shortage of teachers, tends to comprise quality.