How A Boring Finance Call Shows That The Big Three Will Never Understand Tesla

That doubt permeates the industry in southeast Michigan. Just look at some quotes from “Big Three” executives like Bob Lutz, who wrote a column casting doubts on the Palo Alto-based electric car company, even calling it “doomed.”

And then there’s Sergio Marchionne, delusional head of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, who claimed that he could build a Tesla Model 3 competitors and get it on the market within 12 months, if he felt like it. This makes a lot of sense, much in the same way that I can hit a home run at Comerica Park, I just don’t want to embarrass the professionals on the Detroit Tigers.

Marchionne, like Lutz, just can’t see how Tesla can do what his company cannot. “If we can’t do it, with our hundreds of thousands of employees and unfathomably complicated bureaucracy, neither can they,” is the mentality of these well-established automotive giants.

But whether the Model 3 is profitable or not, for Marchionne to claim that he can design and manufacture a car that competes with it in only a matter of months is not just an insult to Tesla, it’s pretty much an insult to his own investors.

It’s just another old-timer exec from Detroit’s “Big Three” who thinks “if the new guys can do it, so can we.” Never mind that there’s never an explanation as to why they haven’t already.

But we could forgive a CEO for outlandish and dumb statements. That’s pretty much a CEO’s job. But that kind of thinking isn’t limited to those at the top, it permeates through Big Three culture. In a recent financial call first picked up by StreetInsider, the former chief engineer of the Chevrolet Volt broke down his predictions of the Tesla Model 3’s production costs, only to be called out by Tesla’s head of investor relations.

How A Boring Finance Call Shows That The Big Three Will Never Understand Tesla
How A Boring Finance Call Shows That The Big Three Will Never Understand Tesla

An analyst for a Swiss financial services company hosted a call with the former chief engineering of the Chevrolet Volt, Jon Bereisa. Bereisa, now the CEO of an EV-focused engineering consulting firm, broke down his estimate of Tesla Model 3 costs, ultimately concluding that the car is unprofitable and that—surprise, surprise—the Chevrolet Bolt is likely a better financial move.

READ MORE :

The news site describes Bereisa’s cost breakdown, which states that the Model 3’s factory variable costs are over $1,500 higher than the $35,000 base price, and that the Bolt’s are nearly five grand lower than its base price. Here’s their exact quote:

I don’t know if the Model 3 will be profitable. It might not be. But regardless, this is another instance of a biased GM veteran in disbelief that Tesla can do something he and his company could not. Even though they’ve done that already, many times over.