Nokia Lumia 800 Vs Samsung Galaxy Note

We’ve been a loss of life to make a comparison among the Lumia 800 and an Android handset, and the moment isn’t close to, it is here! Nokia’s first Windows Phone device has been inside the spotlight due to the fact that its inception, receiving quite a terrific remarks and we decided to position it to the test alongside the largest Android cellphone in the marketplace – the Samsung Galaxy Note. Which one will prevail? Here it goes.

maxresdefault.jpg (1280×720)

Without a doubt, the software program department is what possibly pastimes the maximum of you, and it’ll represent out first round for this night. Nokia joined forces with Microsoft in advance this yr, in a really desperate try and offer its handsets a running machine that could successfully examine itself with Google’s Android or the iOS from Apple. Did it be triumphant? Well, we assume so. The new flagship handset precise to be the principal representative of this Nokia/Microsoft joint is the Lumia 800, which runs on Windows Phone 7.5 Mango and has a few surely extremely good performances. Choosing this cellphone will come up with lots of improvements over the release version of WP Mango, which incorporates help for multi-tasking, social networking, Internet Explorer nine and so on. Microsoft even made a bold move, allowing any Android or iOS customers to check out the WP Mango on their handsets. That suggests accept as true with and trust means energy. On the other hand, Samsung Galaxy Note runs Android 2. Three Gingerbread that’s a real satisfaction to use. You have more apps than you can possibly want thru the Android Market as well as hundreds of customization ability whilst the platform assures a secure and rapid enjoy. The two operating systems are one-of-a-kind, but they may be both tremendous. The WP Mango merits credit score for being able to stick up to the Android OS, and this first round results in a draw.

Form & Build is our second round of the warfare. Samsung maintained its perception in ”plastic uber allies” and used the equal approach to build the Galaxy Note. What got here out is a fairly light and skinny tool but which would not go away the impression that it has to cost plenty of money. The general experience and aesthetic aren’t superb, but the Gorilla Glass coating on the display and common comfort that the tool offers the type of makes up for it. The Lumia 800, on the other hand, feels remarkable within the hand and represents one of the classiest smartphones in the marketplace. It has a polycarbonate chassis that feels strong and looks incredible, whilst also maintaining a thin frame. The Lumia 800 certainly wins this one.

Display – Nokia selected to destroy the Lumia 800 with a three.7 inch AMOLED screen which operates at a resolution of 480 x 800 even as having a pixel density of 252PPI (pixels according to the inch). The AMOLED display proves to be an amazing choice for the Lumia 800, residing up to the Lumia name with a wonderfully bright and vivid display screen. The Galaxy Note additionally capabilities AMOLED generation, but with a moderate difference. AMOLED is Samsung’s toddler, accordingly allowing their telephone to acquire a Super AMOLED display screen, operating at 800 x 1280 while featuring a pixel density of 285PPI and measuring a pill-size five. Three inches. Both AMOLED’s are possible competitors of Apple’s Retina Display, taking part in quite a lot the identical degree of responsiveness and occasional energy needs. Although the Nokia Lumia 800 advantages from a notable cellular show, this round truly is going to the Samsung Galaxy Note.

Nokia-Lumia-1520-vs-Samsung-Galaxy-Note-3-001.jpg (1600×1200)

Processor and Memory – The Lumia 800 runs on a single core 1.4GHz CPU whilst also proposing an Adreno 205 GPU and has 512MB of RAM. Apps, games, lots of duties are chewed with none trouble with the aid of this cobination of electricity, however another time the Galaxy Note comes higher geared up. It sports a 1.4Ghz dual-middle ARM Cortex-A9 processor, Mali-400MP GPU and 1GB RAM providing you with blistering speeds on the way to carry out any preferred motion. It also has more garage area, with sixteen or 32GB which might be pre-setup and a microSD card helping as much as some other 32GB. Meanwhile, Nokia’s handset can simplest provide 16GB of the inner room, without a microSD assist. Winner – Galaxy Note.

The digicam spherical proves to be a difficult one, due to the fact each handset have appropriate snappers. Everyone is aware of that over time, Nokia’s relationship with Carl Zeiss produced some truly first-rate camera telephones and the one at the Lumia 800 is no exception. Its 8MP camera advantages from dual-LED flash, autofocus, geo-tagging, and 720p movie seize. It gives a good revel in, but it kinda’ leaves us wanting for extra. It has a few minor smooth spots, namely it struggles to focus and sometimes appears worked to begin from cold, however, these things could be ironed out with a software program replace. The Galaxy Note capabilities an 8MP digital camera as properly, which comes with autofocus, LED flash, picture stabilization, geo-tagging, touch awareness, face & smile detection and 1080p video seize capability. This camera keeps the standard set through the one at the Galaxy S II, which is quite a top notch. The thing that helps the Note win this spherical is its front-going through the 2MP digital camera, allowing you to have all of the video conferences and humorous self-photos you would possibly need. Galaxy Note wins this one as properly.

Nokia-Lumia-1520-vs-Samsung-Galaxy-Note-3-011.jpg (1600×1200)

Final mind – Nokia’s flagship put up pretty a fight today, however, because the rounds got here to a stop, most effective one name prevailed: Samsung Galaxy Note. It has spectacular energy, a lovely screen and plenty of other super functions. The Lumia 800 is undoubtedly a big step forward for the Finnish agency. Their tool has a terrific design, some certainly pleasant specifications, and an awesome working system. It proved to be a worthy adversary to any Android handset, that is itself a performance.